MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554608437

The Sweetness of Saying “mother”? Maternity and Narrativity in L.M. Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables

2009· article· en· W1554608437 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christa Zeller Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDaughterAmbivalenceNarrativeSilenceNarrativityPsychoanalysisIdentity (music)Gender studiesPsychologySociologyArtLiteratureAestheticsPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lucy Maud Montgomery approaches mother figures with great hesitancy and ambivalence in Anne of Green Gables. Psychoanalytically, the novel can be read as a narrative of female identity and self-development in which there lurks the unspeakable anxiety that maternity may equal silence and the death of creativity. Far from producing an idealized reunion between mother and daughter, the text offers an ambivalent representation of the maternal that discourages identification with the mother figure. Maternity in Anne of Green Gables exists in tension with narrativity and presents a conflict of a kind that is pervasive in Victorian women’s writing. In a daughter-directed and daughter-centric narrative, the mother is cast in a role in which she opposes the daughter through consistent attempts to cut off the daughter’s speech.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207