MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554609486 · doi:10.7202/000340ar

Femmes, violences et espace public : une réflexion sur les politiques de sécurité

2002· article· fr· W1554609486 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marylène Lieber

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPublic spacePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lorsqu'on se penche sur les politiques publiques concernant les violences en France, on relève une division des compétences entre les politiques dites « de sécurité » et les politiques « contre les violences faites aux femmes ». On constate que les politiques de sécurité, en se basant sur les statistiques de criminalité et de victimation, portent essentiellement sur l'espace public et marginalisent les violences faites aux femmes dans l'espace privé. Pour autant, elles ne prennent pas non plus en considération les violences perpétrées à leur encontre dans l'espace public. Or, divers exemples venant de pays étrangers esquissent des réponses faites par les pouvoirs publics à ces violences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.027
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207