MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554700287 · doi:10.24259/perennial.v8i1.209

PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH SEKTOR KEHUTANAN PADA ERAOTONOMI DAERAH DI KABUPATEN MUNA

2012· article· en· W1554700287 on OpenAlexaff
A Mujetahid

Bibliographic record

VenuePERENNIAL · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegional autonomyRevenueLocal governmentGovernment (linguistics)BusinessProduct (mathematics)AutonomyDecentralizationPublic administrationForestryFinanceEconomicsPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was aimed to know contribution of forestry sector to Local Government Revenue at district of Muna in regional autonomy era. The research result is expected to contribute in evaluating and compiling Regional Budget and Expenditure Plan. The result is also intended as an evaluation of forest product restribution policy. Data were collected with purpossive sampling using observation technique/survey, interview and discussion with related stakeholders. The data was then processed, tabulated, clasified base on with research aim, and analysed descriptively. The results show that the contribution of forestry sector to Local Government Revenue to Muna district during 2000-2004 in average was 36.77% of Local Government Revenue in total. Key words: contribution, forestry sector, Local Government Revenue, regional autonomy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePERENNIALSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207