MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554824531

«Confesión» y «Nicodemo el fariseo»: un estudio comparativo

2009· article· es· W1554824531 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGredos (University of Salamanca) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Philosophy and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthical egoismConfession (law)PhilosophyHumanitiesReading (process)LiteratureEpistemologyArtLinguisticsLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unamuno acknowledges the lasting impression left on him through his reading of Tolstoy, who he recognised as being of a similar spirit, as Unamuno’s own words indicate the influence of Tolstoy’s ideas amongst all his readers: «And Tolstoy, the great egoist according to the lesser egoist, the lavish promoter of his own being, has left that to us. He has left us his being, which is our being, of each one of us who read his works, his acts, and it enriches our being» (4:1395, The Egoism of Tolstoy). The objective of this archive is to analyse the convergent ideas in the religious thinking of both writers in the Confession by Tolstoy and Nicodemus Fariseus by Unamuno. The religious ideas of Tolstoy and Unamuno, which are linked to their personalities and actions will also be analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it