MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554837990 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.10790

John M. P. McErlean, Napoléon et Pozzo di Borgo 1764-1821

2009· article· fr· W1554837990 on OpenAlexaffabout
Malcolm Crook

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Longtemps professeur d’histoire à l’Université de Toronto, John McErlean a publié ce volume en anglais il y a une dizaine d’années, chez un petit éditeur du pays de Galles dont les livres se vendent très cher (Napoleon and Pozzo di Borgo in Corsica and After, 1764-1821. Not Quite a Vendetta, Lampeter, Edwin Mellen Press, 1996). C’est sans doute grâce à l’aide des afficionados contemporains de Bonaparte que cet ouvrage paraît désormais en français, quelque peu abrégé et dans un format plus ac...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207