MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554855718 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2004.1328779

A novel wideband DOA estimation technique based on harmonic source model for a uniform linear array

2004· article· en· W1554855718 on OpenAlexaff
Yegui Xiao, Liying Ma, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandWaveformCovariance matrixComputer scienceDirection of arrivalAlgorithmSingular value decompositionHarmonicSIGNAL (programming language)A priori and a posterioriTrigonometric functionsEstimation theoryElectronic engineeringMathematicsAcousticsAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wideband direction of arrival (DOA) estimation problem has attracted a lot of attention in recent years due to its practical importance in many important areas. In this paper, a wideband DOA technique is proposed. This technique is based on two main ideas: (i) the correlation between the sensor measurements of a uniform linear array (ULA) and a sine or cosine waveform with known frequency forms a sequence that may be regarded as a sinusoidal signal with multiple frequencies associated with the time delays of all the sources; (ii) the DOA estimation can then be cast into a frequency estimation problem that may be solved by utilizing the AR model of a sinusoidal signal. The DOAs are identified by a grid search based on the estimated AR model. The new technique may be applied to both incoherent as well as coherent real-valued sources of harmonic or nonharmonic nature. Furthermore, the method does not require the use of the computationally intensive singular value decomposition (SVD) operation and the a priori knowledge of the number sources. It has been demonstrated through extensive simulations that the proposed technique is advantageous compared to the other commonly used techniques, such as the incoherent wideband MUSIC (IWM) and the coherent steered covariance matrix (STCM) based methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207