MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554896830

The Confessing Tongue: Religious Allusions in Sylvia Plath's "Tulips"

2012· article· en· W1554896830 on OpenAlex
Raya Dawn Joan MacKenzie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œalbatross · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfessionalConfession (law)PoetryLiteratureArtSociologyLawPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay explores the religious allusions in Sylvia Plath’s “Tulips” through an analysis of the poem’s relationship to the confessional genre.  Both the Catholic confession and the poetic confession require a level of commitment to the self and to social dialogue.  I argue that the speaker, though presenting her speech in a confessional frame, remains unwilling to engage with herself and her society throughout most of “Tulips.”  In particular she avoids association with motherhood and Mary, both symbolic of the full engagement of the self as generative and responsible for other human beings.   Slowly, however, the speaker re-connects to herself and her community as she owns more and more of the religious imagery in the poem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it