MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W155513443 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.6.a1344-d

Effect of chronic treadmill running on apoptotic protein expression in soleus muscle of normotensive and hypertensive rats

2007· article· en· W155513443 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joe Quadrilatero, Drew A. Graham, James W. E. Rush

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsSkeletal muscleInternal medicineEndocrinologyXIAPSoleus muscleMedicineApoptosissedMuscle hypertrophyDNA fragmentationMyocyteCaspaseBiologyProgrammed cell deathBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Augmented apoptotic signaling in skeletal muscle has been well documented in several conditions including aging, chronic heart failure, disuse, and neuromuscular disorders. Recently, we have found increased DNA fragmentation and altered apoptotic protein levels in skeletal muscle of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) relative to normotensive controls (WKY). Current evidence suggests that exercise may alter apoptosis‐related proteins in skeletal muscle; however, the effect of exercise on skeletal muscle apoptosis in hypertensive animals is unclear. Male WKY (n=24) and SHR (n=24) rats were assigned to a sedentary (SED) condition or exercise (EX) consisting of progressive treadmill running 5 days/wk for 6 wks. Compared to WKY controls, soleus muscle of SHR had decreased anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐2, XIAP and ARC protein levels as well as elevated pro‐apoptotic caspase 3 activity. Further, the levels of Bcl‐2, MnSOD and Hsp70 protein in soleus muscle were significantly elevated following EX compared to the SED condition. In contrast, EX training had no effect on ARC, XIAP and CuZnSOD protein levels as well as caspase 3 activity. These results suggest that exercise can alter the expression of several proteins which may provide protection against skeletal muscle apoptosis in both SHR and WKY rats; however, exercise may not influence caspase signaling. Research supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→