MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555327788 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab62

62 SPINDLE MORPHOGENESIS AND THE MORPHOLOGY OF CHROMOSOMES IN MOUSE NUCLEAR TRANSFER: AN ABNORMAL START IN CLONING OF MICE

2004· article· en· W1555327788 on OpenAlexafffund
Van Thuan Nguyen, Sayaka Wakayama, Satoshi Kishigami, Teruhiko Wakayama

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsCell biologyBiologySomatic cellMultipolar spindlesMitosisSomatic cell nuclear transferSpindle apparatusMolecular biologyCellEmbryoGeneticsCell divisionEmbryogenesisBlastocyst

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloning of mammals by somatic nuclear transfer (NT) was achieved more than 6 years ago. Nonetheless, the success rate is very low. Although spindles and nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) are thought to play important roles in the cell cycle and maybe reprogramming after NT, the spindle and NuMA morphogenesis after NT is not well understood. The aim of this study was to examine the spindle, NuMA morphogenesis and chromosome morphology in mouse NT. Maturated mouse oocytes were collected from mature B6D2F1 females 16 h after hCG injection. The donor nuclei used in this study were cumulus cells. A donor nucleus was injected into an oocyte by means of a piezo pulse system. For double labeling, DNA was stained with PI (red) or Hoechst 33342 (blue); tubulin, NuMA, and phosphorylated histone H3 were stained with FITC or alexa 488 (green). All samples were visualized with a BioRad Radiance 2100 confocal scanning laser microscope. In this study, the spindle, NuMA morphogenesis, chromosome morphology, and histone H3 phosphorylation were identified using more than 3000 maturated mouse oocytes in five experimental studies to examine (1) the morphological changes of spindle and NuMA in NT oocytes at 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 360 min after injection of somatic cell nuclei into intact or enucleated maturated oocytes; (2) the localization and morphology of spindles and NuMA of NT embryo followed by activation at 1, 2, and 6 h after somatic nuclear injection; (3) the effects of the timing of activation and donor cell membrane on the spindle morphogenesis; (4) the effects of intact nuclear membrane or its breakdown by micropipette on spindle morphogenesis; and (5) the correlation between donor cell chromosome condensation and histone H3 phosphorylation after injection into enucleated maturated oocytes. As control, the NuMA morphogenesis during the early pronuclear stages of NT was compared with those of ICSI oocytes. We consistently observed that abnormal spindle morphogenesis occurred during the early stages of mouse NT. Most of the NT oocytes began with monopolar spindle and monopolar NuMA (90–95%), and this phenomenon occurred 10 min after NT. Only 5–10% of NT oocytes started with bipolar spindles. However, monopolar spindles were transformed into bipolar spindles during 30–60 min after NT by bipolarization of centrosomal NuMA. After activation, NuMA was localized in the perispindle region, and finally concentrated inside the pronuclei of embryo. This spindle morphogenesis was independent of the presence or absence of metaphase II [not like in rhesus monkeys, whereas meiotic spindle removal depletes the ooplasm of NuMA and HSET, both vital for mitotic spindle pole formation (Lanza R et al., 2003 Science, 300, 297)]. The breakdown of the donor nuclear membrane by micropipette resulted in the increase of bipolar spindle formation in NT. The initiation of chromosome condensation and histone H3 phosphorylation were observed 30 min after NT and the maximum of histone H3 phosphorylation was occurred 60 to 90 min after NT. Future studies are required to elucidate the mechanism of monopolar spindle formation, chromosomal abnormalities in NT, and the relation of the monopolar phenomenon to the success rate in mammalian cloning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207