MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

John Warham (1919–2010)

2010· article· en· W1555445463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David G. Ainley

Bibliographic record

VenueIbis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld War IIHistoryOrnithologyWildlifeNatural (archaeology)CivilizationNatural historyFirst world warEnvironmental ethicsAncient historyEthnologyArchaeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John Warham inhabited a world in which research is driven by an insatiable thirst for knowledge and in which information not published is information lost.This philosophy propelled John throughout his life and career and it is what made his contribution to the science of avian ecology so significant.To marine ornithology, specifically, he stands among giants like Robert Cushman Murphy.John was born in Halifax, Yorkshire, England, in October 1919 and began to explore the natural world at an early age.At 18 he landed his first real job, a laboratory assistant in a textile plant, but his plans to pursue a degree in colour chemistry were derailed by the Second World War.He spent the next 6½ years in the British army, leaving as a Captain in 1946.One accomplishment of this period was, during a short leave, marrying Pat Sabido, who would be his lifelong and cherished companion.John was demobilized from the army shortly after the war, but lacking mobility was never in his persona.John returned to his first job, quickly rising to management.Not long after, he published his first natural history work, Bird Watcher's Delight (Country Life, London, 1951).At this time the Warhams, suffering a mutual midlife crisis and recognizing that the world's wildlife was in jeopardy, became scientific vagabonds and travelled at the periphery of civilization.For the next 12 years, they lived in the wilds of Australia, surviving on fees gained from natural history writing and photography in the popular press, and on money Pat earned cooking for outback stations.They visited many offshore islands, including a 15-month stint by John as a biologist on Macquarie Island with the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition.During this period, John managed to publish his second book, The Technique of Bird Photography, which ran to four editions (Focal Press, London & New York, 1956, 1966, 1973, 1983).He was the first to employ stop-action bird photography.In 1961, the Warhams returned to Britain, where John pursued a Bachelor of Science degree at Durham University.By this time he had already published 35 scientific papers, mostly about seabirds and all in mainstream journals, such as 'The breeding of the Great-winged Petrel, Pterodroma macroptera' in Ibis (1956) and 'The breeding of the Flesh-footed Shearwater, Puffinus carneipes' in Auk (1958).He finished his BSc in 1965, having by then published an additional 14 papers, including 'The biology of the Giant Petrel, Macronectes giganteus' (Auk, 1962) and 'The Rockhopper Penguin, Eudyptes chrysocome, at Macquarie Island' (Auk, 1963).Three years later, in 1968, he finished his MSc at Durham University, an activity that slowed his publication rate a bit, but which led to 'The White-headed Petrel Pterodroma lessoni at Macquarie Island' (Emu, 1967).At this point, the Warhams moved to Christchurch, New Zealand, closer to lots of seabirds, and the place he would live for the rest of his life.Here John accepted his second real job, Lecturer in Zoology at the University of Canterbury, while Pat continued her career in nursing, as well as an 18-year stint as President of the Herb Society of Christchurch.John began working, too, toward a PhD, which would involve a comparative study of the breeding biology of the crested penguins (Eudyptes).He had gathered information on Royal Eudyptes schlegeli and Rockhopper Penguins at Macquarie, but to continue required expeditions to the Antipodes, Snares

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1490.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIbisSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207