Contribuciones teóricas y metodológicas de un acercamiento multi-posicional y el análisis de rutas migratorias: El ejemplo de migración entre Marruecos y Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basado en una serie de resultados de investigacion sobre la migracion marroqui a Canada, este ensayo busca probar como el enfoque sobre las rutas migratorias de un grupo nacional de emigrantes especifico y la utilizacion de un enfoque multi–posicional metodologico, no conducira a la etnificacion, culturalizacion o nacionalizacion de las realidades experimentadas sino al posicionamiento de las acciones dentro de sus contextos estructurales politicos, culturales, sociales y economicos. Al recurrir a un enfoque inductivo, esta perspectiva nos permite identificar fronteras (en un sentido simbolico) mas alla de las culturales o de pertenencia nacional, recordandonos la heterogeneidad interna del grupo nacional estudiado, permitiendonos capturar otros factores decisivos sobre la ruta migratoria, y beneficiando nuestra comprension sobre la pluralidad de las practicas espaciales y estrategias de integracion desarrolladas por ejecutivos sociales al enfrentar las oportunidades y limitaciones concretas que se encuentran durante todo el proceso migratorio
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".