MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555478167 · doi:10.1080/01496395.2012.672355

Coalescence/Filtration of an Oil-In-Water Emulsion in an Immobilized <i>Mucor rouxii</i> Biomass Bed

2012· article· en· W1555478167 on OpenAlexafffund
Asha Srinivasan, T. Viraraghavan, Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryEmulsionChromatographyFiltration (mathematics)Coalescence (physics)Biomass (ecology)Cross-flow filtrationVolumetric flow ratePulp and paper industryMembraneBiochemistryAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breakdown mechanisms and flow characteristics involved in an immobilized M. rouxii biomass bed treating oil-in-water emulsion were investigated. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the applicability of the well-known Carman-Kozeny filtration equation to a 1000 mm immobilized M. rouxii biomass bed treating a standard mineral oil-in-water emulsion at six different flow rates (12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 mL/min). The specific permeability coefficient, the Carman-Kozeny constant, and the shape factor of immobilized M. rouxii bed were found to be 2.135 × 10−8 m2, 5.03, and 1.13, respectively. The coalescence efficiency decreased with an increase in bed depth (from 15.9% at 200 mm to 4.0% at 1000 mm depth for a flow rate of 12 mL/min). Results indicated possible sequential occurrence of coalescence and filtration in the immobilized M. rouxii biomass bed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeparation Science and TechnologySame topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207