El tercer cuerpo: estructuras en la construcción del sujeto masculino en las películas narrativas gays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classical homoerotic imagery presupposed three different characterizations in the construction and expression of the male body. Two of them were objects of the homoerotic gaze, the ephebe (or adolescent youth) and the mature athlete, which are fairly unproblematic visually. These predicated in turn a third body, an implied gay subject, the invisible desiring body of the producer-spectator- behind the camera, rarely visualized within the frame. This third body stood in for the authorial self as well as for the assumed gay spectator. Representation of this third body is unstable and has become problematic. In the gay-authored narrative cinema, as gay themes become more and more explicit after the Second World War, filmmakers replace the alibis of their precursors with an agenda of self-representation and self definiton. Follwing a roughly chronological approach, Thomas Waugh traces the characterization of this “third body” in a number of texts ranging from Mikael to Death in Venice and Teorema. Waugh explores ways to characterize the desiring homosexual, as well as recurrent narrative motifs in plots with gays characters, reflecting diverse conceptions of sexual dissidence
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".