MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Identification

2018· other· en· W1555632581 on OpenAlexaff
Johanna M. Rommens

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsBiologyGeneChromosomeCystic fibrosisInheritance (genetic algorithm)GenomeHuman genomeGene mappingComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With the realisation that some diseases exhibit defined patterns of inheritance in families, it was apparent that careful investigation of the genetic material of these family members should reveal clues to underlying disease cause. For cystic fibrosis (CF), a debilitating disease that affects many organs with progressive lung morbidity, deficiencies in the gene known as CFTR lead to impaired anion channel function in epithelial tissues. Early genetic and physical mapping studies of chromosome 7 led to the identification of this CF causal gene, providing impetus for the Human Genome Project and the refined chromosome maps that are now available at chromosome function and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence levels. Key Concepts Cystic fibrosis displays autosomal recessive inheritance. Genetic and physical marker maps converge to yield a scaffold of chromosome 7. Only small segments of human chromosomes correspond to genes that encode proteins. Refined chromosome and genome DNA sequence maps provide resources for disease gene discovery. Causal gene discovery enables molecular diagnostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207