MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555634426 · doi:10.1109/robot.1994.351393

The agile eye: a high-performance three-degree-of-freedom camera-orienting device

2002· article· en· W1555634426 on OpenAlexafffund
Clément Gosselin, Josée Hamel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWorkspaceComputer scienceKinematicsArtificial intelligenceAgile software developmentDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Computer visionSimulationRobotPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents some results obtained in the development of a three-degree-of-freedom camera-orienting device. The agile eye, as it is referred to, is capable of an orientation workspace larger than that of the human eye. The miniature camera mounted on the end-effector can be pointed within a cone of 140 degrees opening with plus or minus 30 degrees in torsion. The mechanical architecture of the orienting device is based on a spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator which leads to high-performance dynamics. A kinematic optimization has been performed in order to determine the dimensional parameters of the prototype which would provide the best overall accuracy. A complete dynamical model of the manipulator has also been derived and programmed, and simulation results have guided the mechanical design. Finally, a prototype has been built and experimented with.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations349
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207