Les travaux majeurs de rénovation du parc immobilier HLM de l’Office municipal d’habitation de Montréal : forces et limites de cette forme de gouvernance partagée avec les locataires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Office municipal d’habitation de Montréal (OMHM) gère le parc immobilier d’habitation à loyer modique de l’île de Montréal et est, à ce titre, la plus importante entreprise publique de logements locatifs au Québec. Le « virage locataire » de l’OMHM, ces dernières années, s’est notamment traduit par une forme de gouvernance partagée qui vise l’engagement des locataires dans le déroulement des travaux majeurs de rénovation en cours. Nous nous appuyons sur les propos d’acteurs engagés (gestionnaires, locataires, administrateurs), afin d’analyser cette nouvelle forme de gouvernance et d’en discerner les forces, les paradoxes et les limites. Peut-on mettre en place une gestion locale habilitante alors que le service à la clientèle demeure la raison d’être de l’entreprise ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".