MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555773404 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129298

Extracting seafloor elevations from side-scan sonar imagery for SLAM data association

2015· article· en· W1555773404 on OpenAlexaff
Colin M. MacKenzie, Mae Seto, Ya‐Jun Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersOffice of Naval Research Global
KeywordsSonarLandmarkElevation (ballistics)Simultaneous localization and mappingUnderwaterArtificial intelligenceSide-scan sonarAssociation (psychology)False positive paradoxComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Computer visionData associationSeafloor spreadingData setGeologyPattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingMobile robotRobotEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data association is a critical component of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). This is challenging in an underwater environment with an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) where currents can alter the AUV's perceived location of landmarks used to update the AUV's estimated position. In an effort to reduce false positives in the data association seafloor elevation trends local to SLAM landmarks are used as additional features to assist in verifying associations between landmarks. Elevation gradients are less sensitive to sensor error and seafloor changes over time than other environmental features. Elevations are extracted from side-scan sonar data and new landmark elevation profiles are compared to previously observed ones to find the best associations. This paper reports on a unique ability to identify the best match within a set of landmarks and is a good complementary feature to an existing data association algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207