MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556012197

The Cistercian Evolution: The Invention of a Religious Order in Twelfth-Century Europe (review)

2001· article· en· W1556012197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stacey Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryClassicsIdeal (ethics)CharismaAncient historyLawTheologyPhilosophyArchaeologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS Constance Hoffman Berman, The Cistercian Evolution: The Inven- tion of a Religious Order in Twelfth-Century Europe (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania 2000) xxiv + 382 pp.; 49 b/w illustra- tions; 5 appendices. The Cistercian Order represents the most amazing success story of twelfth-century Europe, and perhaps of the entire history of monasti- cism. As such, it has attracted the scholarly attention of generations of academics, who interpret the early history of the Order generally as follows. Fostered by the general milieu of religious reform and by the charismatic writings of Bernard of Clairvaux, the Order grew from humble beginnings at Citeaux into a network of abbeys radiating out- ward from Burgundy with astonishing speed. New monasteries were founded by a process called “apostolic gestation,” whereby a small group of monks leave the mother house to found the daughter house, and were characteristically located in remote places, according to the ideal of the “desert.” In her monograph The Cistercian Evolution, how- ever, Constance Hoffman Berman gives a significantly different inter- pretation to the received tradition of the early Cistercian Order. Her main thesis is that the Order was officially established in the third quarter of the twelfth century, and not the first quarter. Its main form of propagation, moreover, was not “apostolic gestation,” but rather the incorporation of existing religious communities. She also challenges the traditional view that there were no Cistercian nuns in the twelfth century. In fact, her research into this particular question revealed fea- tures in the sources that were irreconcilable with the traditional history of the Cistercian Order as a whole. Attention to primary sources—in- cluding narrative accounts, charters and other documents—and ar- chaeological evidence governs the focus of her research, and her insis- tence on always returning to the manuscript evidence helps reveal the inadequacy of the traditional view of Cistercian beginnings. The monograph is divided into five chapters, the last of which serves as a conclusion of her argument and a reiteration of her thesis that the Cistercian Order did not emerge as an organized monastic order until the third quarter of the twelfth century. Chapter 1 covers the debate over the early narrative sources and examines architectural remains, particularly for women’s abbeys, which do not usually leave behind as

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207