Sliding Wear of a Squeeze Cast Magnesium Composite AM60-(Al2O3)f at Low Loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mg matrix composites AM60-x% (Al2O3)f (x=9,11,26) were fabricated by Al2O3 fibre preform preparation and squeeze casting technique. Sliding wear behaviour of these composites were studied by conducting boundary lubricated pin-on-disk tests under ultra-mild wear conditions at 25 ºC and 100 ºC against AISI 52100 steel balls. The damage in AM60-9% (Al2O3)f at 25 ºC occurred as follows: Al2O3 fibre fracture and fragmentation, sinking in of the fragmented fibres leading to decrease in fibre elevation, and damage to Mg matrix. The fibre fracture and fragmentation process, leading towards damage to the Mg matrix, was attributed to: i) high applied contact pressure, ii) matrix hardening and, iii) high fibre length. Increasing the Al2O3 fibre volume content delayed the transition to higher rate of material loss but inflicted greater damage to the counterface. At 100 °C, the formation of an oil residue layer on the worn surfaces delayed the wear transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".