MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556335505 · doi:10.1002/9783527610709.ch6

The ELF Topological Analysis Contribution to Conceptual Chemistry and Phenomenological Models

2007· other· en· W1556335505 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Silvi, R. J. Gillespie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic and Organometallic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypervalent moleculePhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)Theoretical physicsChemistryMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Why ELF and What is ELF? Concepts from the ELF Topology The Synaptic Order The Localization Domains ELF Population Analysis VSEPR Electron Domains and the Volume of ELF Basins Examples of the Correspondence Between ELF Basins and the Domains of the VSEPR Model Octet Molecules Hydrides (CH4, NH3, H2O) AX4 (CH4, CF4, SiCl4) AX3E and AX2E2 (NCl3, OCl2) Hypervalent Molecules PCl5 and SF6 SF4 and ClF3 AX7 and AX6E Molecules Multiple Bonds C2H4 and C2H2 Si2Me4 and Si2Me2 Conclusions References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.013
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInorganic and Organometallic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207