MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556403580 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.022002

Estimate of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>

2007· article· lv· W1556403580 on OpenAlexaff
Mikołaj Misiak, H. M. Asatrian, K. Bieri, M. Czakon, Andrzej Czarnecki, T. Ewerth, Andrea Ferroglia, Paolo Gambino, Martin Gorbahn, C. Greub, Ulrich Haisch, A. Hovhannisyan, Tobias Hurth, Alexander Mitov, V. Poghosyan, Magdalena Ślusarczyk, Matthias Steinhauser

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum chromodynamicsParticle physicsRadiative transferOrder (exchange)LambdaMesonAlgorithmNuclear physicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combining our results for various $O({\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}^{2})$ corrections to the weak radiative $B$-meson decay, we are able to present the first estimate of the branching ratio at the next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD. We find $\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{X}_{s}\ensuremath{\gamma})=(3.15\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.23)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$ for ${E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}>1.6\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\overline{B}$-meson rest frame. The four types of uncertainties: nonperturbative (5%), parametric (3%), higher-order (3%), and ${m}_{c}$-interpolation ambiguity (3%) have been added in quadrature to obtain the total error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3620.329

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations651
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207