MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556416173

On statistical restricted isometry property of a new class of deterministic partial Fourier compressed sensing matrices

2012· article· en· W1556416173 on OpenAlexaff
Nam Yul Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Information Theory and its Applications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestricted isometry propertyCompressed sensingBlock matrixDFT matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)Concatenation (mathematics)AlgorithmIsometry (Riemannian geometry)Sparse matrixMutual coherenceDiscrete Fourier transform (general)MathematicsFourier transformSingle-entry matrixComputer scienceCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Fourier analysisCombinatoricsSymmetric matrixMathematical analysisMatrix functionSquare matrixFractional Fourier transformPhysicsGaussian
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compressed sensing is a novel technique where one can recover sparse signals from the undersampled measurements. In this paper, a new class of partial Fourier matrices is studied for deterministic compressed sensing. A basic partial Fourier matrix is constructed by choosing the rows deterministically from the inverse discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix. By a column rearrangement, the matrix is represented as a concatenation of DFT-based submatrices. Then, a full or a part of columns of the concatenated matrix is used to form a K ×N sensing matrix for deterministic compressed sensing. It is shown that the sensing matrix forms a tight frame with nearly optimal coherence. Theoretically, the sensing matrix turns out to have the statistical restricted isometry property (StRIP) for unique sparse recovery guarantee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Symposium on Information Theory and its ApplicationsSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207