MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1556916018 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a398-b

Immunohistochemical findings in human pituitaries following traumatic brain injury

2007· article· en· W1556916018 on OpenAlexaff
Fateme Salehi, Kálmán Kovács, Eric A. Pfeifer, Michael D. Cusimano, Bernd W. Scheithauer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyHypopituitarismTraumatic brain injuryHormonePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following traumatic brain injury (TBI) approximately 25% of patients develop partial or complete hypopituitarism (HP). In our previous histologic study we found no changes in the pituitaries of patients who died instantly after TBI (Group I). In 43% of patients who survived 1‐7 days acute pituitary infarcts were apparent (Group II). In the present work, 3 group I and 7 group II pituitaries with infarcts were selected for histological and immunohistochemistry (IH) evaluation. IH was performed for adenohypophyseal hormones by the streptavidin‐biotin‐peroxidase method. In group I pituitaries, no histological changes were found and IH showed normal distribution and intensity for GH, PRL, ACTH, TSH, FSH, LH and α‐subunit (α‐SU). In group II pituitaries acute infarct (size range: 10% to 80%) was evident. IH in the non‐necrotic areas revealed no significant change. In the area of early necrosis the dying cells were still immunopositive (IP) for GH, PRL, ACTH, TSH, FSH, LS, and α‐SU. Even in the necrotic cells with loss of cell membrane, nuclear pyknosis, rhexis and lysis IP cytoplasms were still apparent indicating that hormone release is affected by ischemia. Subsequently the intensity of IP cells gradually decreased and IP granules leaked out from the necrotic cells and were seen extracellularly. In conclusion infarction and loss of adenohypophyseal cells may contribute to HP but other factors should also be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→