Influence of alitretinoin on the pharmacokinetics of the oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) is currently registered in many European countries and in Canada as the only licensed treatment for severe chronic hand eczema unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. Alitretinoin, like all retinoids, is teratogenic, and women of child-bearing potential must strictly adhere to pregnancy-prevention measures. AIM: To investigate the influence of alitretinoin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate (Ortho Tri-Cyclen 28(®)), a commonly prescribed combination oral contraceptive. METHODS: In total, 16 healthy premenopausal women received three consecutive cycles of the triphasic contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate together with concomitant oral alitretinoin 40 mg once daily during cycle 2. Steady-state PK (noncompartmental analysis) of ethinyl estradiol, 17-deacetyl norgestimate, alitretinoin and its main metabolite 4-oxo-alitretinoin were assessed alone and in combination. RESULTS: The PK profiles of ethinyl estradiol and 17-deacetyl norgestimate were similar when contraceptives were given alone or with alitretinoin, and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and the maximum concentration met the conventional criteria for PK equivalence. Similarly, the influence of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on systemic exposure to alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin was not clinically relevant. Alitretinoin was well tolerated when given either alone or with ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically relevant influence of alitretinoin on the PK of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate, and no influence of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on systemic exposure to alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin. Consequently, oral contraception with ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate is an appropriate primary method of birth control during alitretinoin treatment for women of childbearing potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".