Sexualité et espace public : visibilité lesbienne dans le cinéma récent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l'auteure démontre que la circulation et la consommation croissante des images lesbiennes dans l'espace public participent du phénomène complexe d'une culture du visible. Tout en soulignant les inévitables compromis qui découlent d'une telle négociation de la visibilité, elle retrace le potentiel culturel qu'une telle marchandisation de la " différence " représente pour les lesbiennes. L'identité et le désir lesbiens sont donc analysés ici en tant que produits représentationnels aptes à être consommés autant par les hétérosexuels que par les lesbiennes. Par une analyse des diverses stratégies de négociation du désir lesbien tirées de deux films populaires tant auprès d'un public hétérosexuel que gai (Gazon maudit et When Night is Falling), la critique confronte la matérialité de l'identité lesbienne au cinéma à la valeur de l'image saphique sur le marché de l'identité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".