MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557391185

A neural network for classifying clicks of Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon Densirostris)

2008· article· en· W1557391185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David K. Mellinger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsBeaked whaleArtificial neural networkBioacousticsPattern recognition (psychology)Noise (video)Artificial intelligenceBackpropagationSpeech recognitionWhaleComputer scienceBiologyTelecommunicationsFishery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beaked whales are difficult to detect visually, and researchers have thus proposed using acoustic detection and classification.Because of the large data volumes often involved in acoustic detection and classification, automatic methods are often used.Here a neural network classification method is investigated.Using backpropagation, a feedforward neural network with one hidden layer was trained to classify clicks of Blainville's beaked whales and other odontocetes recorded in the Bahamas.Training and testing data consisted of approximately 1600 Blainville's beaked whale clicks and 3100 clicks from other odontocetes.Networks with 2-10 hidden units were trained and tested, with performance curves (ROC curves) calculated at several levels of signal-to-noise ratio.Results for most networks were quite good when compared with previous classification efforts, with less than 3% errors in both the wrong-classification and missed-call categories.Future work includes testing the network on sounds recorded in different noise backgrounds and from other populations of Blainville's beaked whales, and combining it with a detector and evaluating the joint performance.s o m m a i r e Msoplodons sont difficiles voir et chercheurs ont propos d'employer la dtection et la classification acoustique pour en trouver.Face la quantit de donnes produites par dtection et classification acoustiques, mthodes automatises sont souvent utilises.Ici on present une methode de rseau neuronal pour classifier.Un rseau neuronal rtropropagation non rcurrent avec une seule couche cache a t form pour classifier des clics des Msoplodon de Blainville et autres odontoctes enregistrs aux Bahamas.Les donnes de formation se sont composes d 'environs 1600 clics de Msoplodon de Blainville et 3100 clics d 'autres odonotoctes.Reseaux avec 2-10 units caches ont t forms et examins par courbes caractristiques d'opration du rcepteur (ROC curves) calculs plusieurs niveaux du ratio signal/bruit.Rsultats pour la plupart des rseaux taient tout fait bons en comparaison avec des efforts prcdents de classification avec moins de 3% d 'erreurs chez les clics incorrectement classifis ou manqus.Travaux suivre sont essais du rseau avec les enregistrements venant d 'autres niveaus deu bruit de fond et d 'autres populations de Msoplodon de Blainville, et en combinaison avec un detecteur, une evaluation d 'excution commune.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207