MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557660386 · doi:10.1002/qj.2421

High‐resolution temperature and precipitation projections over Ontario, Canada: a coupled dynamical‐statistical approach

2014· article· en· W1557660386 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Xiuquan Wang, Guohe Huang, Qianguo Lin, Xianghui Nie, Jinliang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHigher Education Discipline Innovation Project
KeywordsDownscalingHindcastClimatologyPrecipitationEnvironmental scienceClimate changeSpatial ecologyClimate modelMeteorologyGeographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a dynamical–statistical downscaling approach by coupling the PRECIS regional modelling system and a statistical method—SCADS—to construct very high resolution climate projections for studying climate change impacts at local scales. The coupled approach performs very well in hindcasting the mean temperature of present‐day climate, while the performance for precipitation is relatively poor due to its high spatial variability and nonlinear nature but its spatial patterns are well captured. We then apply the coupled approach for projecting the future climate over the province of Ontario, Canada at a fine resolution of 10 km. The results show that there would be a significant warming trend throughout this century for the entire province while less precipitation is projected for most of the selected weather stations. The projections also demonstrate apparent spatial variability in the amount of precipitation but no noticeable changes are found in the spatial patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207