MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557744148 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2003.1273014

A stochastic approximation approach to the robust power control problem

2004· article· en· W1557744148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStochastic approximationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationApproximation algorithmPower controlDistributed algorithmPower (physics)Approximation theoryRobust controlPoint (geometry)AlgorithmMathematicsControl systemDistributed computingEngineeringKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to develop a novel distributed power control algorithm based on the theory of stochastic approximation. The optimal control problem is first converted into a stochastic approximation problem in which the zero point of a specific function is determined. A distributed power control algorithm is then derived using standard techniques. In the distributed algorithm, each user iteratively updates its power level by using estimates of the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) of its channel. It does not require any knowledge of the link gains and state information of other users. The algorithm can handle errors in the SIR estimates. Hence it is a robust algorithm that can be used in practical scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207