MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557761653 · doi:10.1002/2014gl062898

Interhemispheric air temperature phase relationships in the nonlinear Dansgaard‐Oeschger oscillation

2015· article· en· W1557761653 on OpenAlexaff
Guido Vettoretti, W. R. Peltier

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyClimatologyNorthern HemisphereSouthern HemisphereThermoclineThermohaline circulationZonal and meridionalSea surface temperatureNorth Atlantic Deep WaterOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It has previously been suggested that the Southern Ocean might act as a thermal reservoir in mediating the relationship between the northern and southern hemisphere air temperature signals during a Dansgaard‐Oeschger cycle. On the basis of a climate model‐based analysis, we demonstrate on the contrary that it is equatorial and subtropical North Atlantic thermocline waters that act so as to integrate and damp the northern hemisphere signal to fix the amplitude and phase of the southern hemisphere counterpart to the more intense North Atlantic component of the oscillation. The dynamics of the Southern Ocean component of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation are critical in explaining the evolution of the interhemispheric temperature phase relationships. European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica Dronning Maud Land‐inferred air temperature variations are in phase with sea surface temperatures north of the Antarctic sea ice edge, suggesting that it is via a fast atmospheric pathway that this temperature signal is transmitted into the Antarctic ice core record.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207