MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deciphering the cellular and molecular roles of cellular nucleic acid binding protein during cranial neural crest development

2011· article· en· W1557917059 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrea M. J. Weiner, María Antonella Sdrigotti, Robert N. Kelsh, Nora B. Calcaterra

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopment Growth & Differentiation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsMorpholinoBiologyNeural crestZebrafishCell biologyAlternative splicingMessenger RNACell growthPhenotypeNucleic acidTranslation (biology)RNA splicingRNAGeneticsGeneEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular nucleic acid binding protein (Cnbp) is a highly conserved single-stranded nucleic acid binding protein required for rostral head development. The use of a morpholino that inhibits Cnbp mRNA translation previously revealed a role of Cnbp in balancing neural crest cell apoptosis and proliferation in the developing zebrafish. Here, we report the use of another morpholino that specifically modifies the splicing of Cnbp pre-mRNA resulting in a reduction of full-length mRNA levels along with the generation of a novel transcript coding for an isoform that may act as dominant negative proteins. The use of this morpholino resulted in more severe phenotypes that enabled us to demonstrate that Cnbp loss-of-function adversely affects the formation and survival of craniofacial cartilaginous structures not only controlling the ratio of cell proliferation and apoptosis but also defining skeletogenic neural crest cell fate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopment Growth & DifferentiationSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207