Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur considère quatre façons qu’a Danis de se jouer des catégories habituelles de la dramaturgie jeune public. Il explore d’abord la porosité entre théâtre et roman, qui débouche sur un traitement singulier de l’image et d’une temporalité aux contours flous. Puis, il s’attarde à la prise en charge par l’auteur de l’écriture scénique de son texte, avènement qui annonce une période d’expérimentation du côté de la performance. Il examine ensuite le tabou qui concerne les sujets légitimes dans le théâtre jeune public, et plus précisément la question de la sexualité des personnages, que Danis aborde avec franchise et délicatesse. Enfin, l’auteur porte son attention sur le déplacement d’une dramaturgie danisienne fortement enracinée dans le territoire québécois vers l’exploration de tous les ailleurs, où se manifestent notamment les violences faites aux jeunes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".