MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

proBDNF and p75NTR Control Excitability and Persistent Firing of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons

2015· article· en· W1558107540 on OpenAlexafffund
Julien Gibon, Shannon Buckley, Nicolás Unsain, Vesa Kaartinen, Philippe Séguéla, P. A. Barker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceHippocampal formationEntorhinal cortexHippocampusCholinergicPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent firing of entorhinal cortex (EC) pyramidal neurons is a key component of working and spatial memory. We report here that a pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (proBDNF)-dependent p75NTR signaling pathway plays a major role in excitability and persistent activity of pyramidal neurons in layer V of the EC. Using electrophysiological recordings, we show that proBDNF suppresses persistent firing in entorhinal slices from wild-type mice but not from p75NTR-null mice. Conversely, function-blocking proBDNF antibodies enhance excitability of pyramidal neurons and facilitate their persistent firing, and acute exposure to function-blocking p75NTR antibodies results in enhanced firing activity of pyramidal neurons. Genetic deletion of p75NTR specifically in neurons or during adulthood also induces enhanced excitability and persistent activity, indicating that the proBDNF-p75NTR signaling cascade functions within adult neurons to inhibit pyramidal activity. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2)-sensitive transient receptor potential canonical channels play a critical role in mediating persistent firing in the EC and we hypothesized that proBDNF-dependent p75NTR activation regulates PIP2 levels. Accordingly, proBDNF decreases cholinergic calcium responses in cortical neurons and affects carbachol-induced depletion of PIP2. Further, we show that the modulation of persistent firing by proBDNF relies on a p75NTR-Rac1-PI4K pathway. The hypothesis that proBDNF and p75NTR maintain network homeostasis in the adult CNS was tested in vivo and we report that p75NTR-null mice show improvements in working memory but also display an increased propensity for severe seizures. We propose that the proBDNF-p75NTR axis controls pyramidal neuron excitability and persistent activity to balance EC performance with the risk of runaway activity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Persistent firing of entorhinal cortex (EC) pyramidal neurons is required for working memory. We report here that pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (proBDNF) activates p75NTR to induce a Rac1-dependent and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent signaling cascade that suppresses persistent activity. Conversely, using loss-of-function approaches, we find that endogenous proBDNF or p75NTR activation strongly decreases pyramidal neuron excitability and persistent firing, suggesting that a physiological role of this proBDNF-p75NTR cascade may be to regulate working memory in vivo. Consistent with this, mice rendered null for p75NTR during adulthood show improvements in working memory but also display an increased propensity for severe seizures. We propose that by attenuating EC network performance, the proBDNF-p75NTR signaling cascade reduces the probability of epileptogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→