MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558302426

Radial power profiles of single vision silicone hydrogel lenses

2006· article· en· W1558302426 on OpenAlexaff
Craig A. Woods, Arup Roy, D. Fonn

Bibliographic record

VenueDeakin Research Online (Deakin University) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContact lensSilicone hydrogelMedicineOphthalmology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supported by CCLR internal grant Email contact for correspondence: cawoods@uwaterloo.ca © 2007 CCLR – Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo All rights reserved. All data and images were collected, compiled and are exclusively owned, by the CCLR. Unauthorized utilization, editing, reproduction or distribution of this poster or any part thereof is strictly prohibited. -3.00D -6.00D -3.00D -6.00D Air Optix Night & Day -2.76D -6.04D Acuvue Oasys -3.30D -6.40D Air Optix -3.10D -6.00D Acuvue Advance -3.34D -6.68D PureVision -3.12D -5.78D Acuvue 2 -3.13D -6.24D

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeakin Research Online (Deakin University)Same topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207