Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty-two children (13 boys and 9 girls) with chronic cough were treated with the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast (Singulair tbl. 5 mg) administered once daily for four weeks. In 14 children (68%), the cough ceased during the third week of treatment. Children responding to montelukast were found to have higher blood levels of eosinophil cationic protein (S-ECP) in the pretreatment blood sample than children with no response (responders 14.88+/-2.651 microg/l versus nonresponders 6.62+/-0.948 microg/l; p<0.01). Blood S-ECP levels remained higher also in the post-treatment blood sample in responders (10.55+/-1.631 microg/l) compared to nonresponders (6.13+/-0.937 microg/l; p<0.05). The difference is statistically significant. There were also differences in absolute eosinophil blood count and IgE blood levels between the two groups in the pretreatment blood sample. Using 24-hour pH-metry, two children not responding to therapy were subsequently diagnosed to have gastroesophageal reflux. Judging from the results, one might deduct that patients with chronic cough who have increased levels of serum ECP and absolute eosinophil blood counts are likely to benefit from treatment with montelukast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it