MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558466836 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-02-06683-2

Propagation of normality along regular analytic Jordan arcs in analytic functions with values in a complex unital Banach algebra with continuous involution

2002· article· en· W1558466836 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmAnnotationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globevnik and Vidav have studied the propagation of normality from an open subset V V of a region D \mathcal {D} of the complex plane for analytic functions with values in the space L ( H ) \mathcal {L}(\mathcal {H}) of bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H \mathcal {H} . We obtain a propagation of normality in the more general setting of a converging sequence located on a regular analytic Jordan arc in the complex plane for analytic functions with values in a complex unital Banach algebra with continuous involution. We show that in this more general setting, the propagation of normality does not imply functional commutativity anymore as it does in the case studied by Globevnik and Vidav. An immediate consequence of the Propagation of Normality Theorem is that the further generalization given by Wolf of Jamison’s generalization of Rellich’s theorem is equivalent to Jamison’s result. We obtain a propagation property within Banach subspaces for analytic Banach space-valued functions. The propagation of normality differs from the propagation within Banach subspaces since the set of all normal elements does not form a Banach subspace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207