MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558494536 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v58i4.318

Simulation of Y-Site Compatibility of Irinotecan and Leucovorin at Room Temperature in 5% Dextrose in Water in 3 Different Containers

2005· article· en· W1558494536 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Scott E. Walker, Shirley Law, Anitasha Puodziunas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBristol-Myers Squibb (Canada)Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrinotecanPolyvinyl chlorideChemistryChromatographyNuclear chemistryMedicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background: No data are available on the physical compatibility and chemical stability of irinotecan and leucovorin when these 2 drugs are mixed. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the physical compatibility and chemical stability of irinotecan diluted in 5% dextrose in water (D5W) and combined with the racemic form of leucovorin when stored at 23°C, unprotected from light, conditions that simulate Y-site administration of these drugs. Methods: Six combinations of irinotecan and leucovorin were prepared (0.56 mg/mL and 0.94 mg/mL, 0.53 mg/mL and 0.74 mg/mL, 0.59 mg/mL and 0.66 mg/mL, 0.56 mg/mL and 0.27 mg/mL, 0.32 mg/mL and 3.60 mg/mL, and 0.30 mg/mL and 0.68 mg/mL, respectively), representing the concentrations (dose, volume, and infusion rate) most commonly administered in clinical practice. The stability of each solution was evaluated at room temperature (23°C) in 3 different types of containers: polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene–polyethylene copolymer, and glass (control). Each solution was visually inspected for precipitate, colour change, and evolution of gas, and the concentration of each drug was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at time 0 (immediately after mixing) and at 0.5, 1, and 24 h. Each concentration measurement was completed in triplicate. Results: All solutions remained clear and colourless throughout the 24-h study period. More than 96% of the initial concentration of leucovorin and more than 91% of the initial concentration of irinotecan remained after 0.5 h. Rapid degradation of irinotecan was observed in one mixture: irinotecan 0.30 mg/mL and leucovorin 3.60 mg/mL. In this mixture, the concentrations of irinotecan were between 91.57% and 95.09% of the original concentration at 0.5 h, but declined rapidly to between 76.30% and 78.34% by 24 h. This rapid degradation was likely due to the higher pH of the solution created by the high concentration of leucovorin (3.60 mg/mL, equivalent to a dose of 400 mg/m2 body area, in 100 mL, for a 60-min infusion). For all mixtures, the mean concentration of leucovorin at 24 h was greater than 96% of the initial concentration. There was no effect of container type on the rate of degradation of either drug. Conclusions: Given that contact times are likely less than 3 min when standard IV tubing sets are used, it is concluded that irinotecan and leucovorin are physically compatible and chemically stable for a sufficient period of time to allow concurrent infusion via a Y site. RESUME Historique : On ne dispose d’aucune donnee sur la compatibilite physique et la stabilite chimique de l’irinotecan et de la leucovorine lorsque ces deux medicaments sont melanges ensemble. Objectif : Evaluer la compatibilite physique et la stabilite chimique de l’irinotecan dilue dans une solution de dextrose a 5 % dans l’eau (D5W) et melange au compose racemique de leucovorine, puis entrepose a 23 oC, non protege de la lumiere, dans des conditions simulant l’administration de ces medicaments dans un raccord en Y. Methodes : Six melanges d’irinotecan et de leucovorine ont ete prepares (0,56 mg/mL et 0,94 mg/mL; 0,53 mg/mL et 0,74 mg/mL; 0,59 mg/mL et 0,66 mg/mL; 0,56 mg/mL et 0,27 mg/mL; 0,32 mg/mL et 3,60 mg/mL; et 0,30 mg/mL et 0,68 mg/mL, respectivement), representant les concentrations (dose, volume et vitesse de perfusion) les plus frequemment administrees en pratique clinique. On a evalue la stabilite de chaque solution a la temperature ambiante (23 oC) et dans trois differents types de contenants : polychlorure de vinyle (PVC), copolymere de polypropylene et polyethylene, et verre (temoin). Chaque solution a ete inspectee visuellement pour la presence d’un precipite, un changement de couleur et le degagement de gaz, et la concentration de chaque medicament a ete mesuree par chromatographie liquide a haute pression au temps 0 (immediatement apres le melange) puis a 0,5, 1 et 24 h. La concentration de chaque medicament a ete mesuree en triple. Resultats : Toutes les solutions sont demeurees limpides et incolores au cours des 24 heures qu’a dure l'etude. Les solutions ont conserve plus de 96 % de la concentration initiale de leucovorine et plus de 91 % de la concentration initiale d’irinotecan apres 0,5 h. On a observe une degradation rapide de l’irinotecan dans un des melanges : irinotecan a 0,30 mg/mL et leucovorine a 3,60 mg/mL. Dans ce melange, les concentrations d’irinotecan etaient entre 91,57 % et 95,09 % des concentrations initiales a 0,5 h, et elles ont rapidement chute entre 76,30 % et 78,34 % a 24 h. Cette degradation rapide semblait etre attribuable au pH plus eleve de la solution, cause par la forte concentration de leucovorine (3,60 mg/mL, equivalant a une dose de 400 mg/m2 de surface corporelle, dans 100 mL, administree par perfusion d’une duree de 60 minutes). Tous les melanges ont retenu plus de 96 % de la concentration moyenne initiale de leucovorine a 24 h. Le type de contenant n’a pas eu d’effet sur le taux de degradation de l’un ou l’autre medicament. Conclusions : Etant donne que la duree de contact est probablement inferieure a trois minutes avec les tubulures IV standard, on peut conclure que l’irinotecan et la leucovorine sont physiquement compatibles et chimiquement stables durant une periode de temps suffisante pour permettre la perfusion concomitante dans un raccord en Y.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207