MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558667498 · doi:10.1002/9781119945147.ch11

Emerging Antenna Technologies for Space Applications

2012· other· en· W1558667498 on OpenAlexaff
Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini, Mohammad Fakharzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Communications satelliteComputer scienceElectronic engineeringSpace technologyEngineeringOmnidirectional antennaSmart antennaElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsSatelliteAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter presents recent advances in integrated mmWon-chip/in-package Si-based active antenna technologies, new substrate integrated planar antenna technologies, microwave/mmW micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) based techniques, and THz integrated antenna systems will be reviewed along with a comprehensive description of low-cost, high-performance phased-array technology for mobile SATCOM, as an increasingly important case study. The main focus was placed on low-cost technologies that can offer high performance in a compact and reliable package. On-chip antennas provide an exciting opportunity to develop ultra-compact mmWand sub-mmWsystems on-chip and/or inpackage with unmatched performance in terms of conformity and integration with other parts of a complex space system, or as a part of a stand-alone tiny ‘satellite-on-chip’. Cost/size and performance requirements of several space systems, including radio telescopes, space communication and sensing systems, radar, and satellite communications, can be effectively met using compact planar technologies such as SIWand MEMSbased radio front-end and antenna systems. Controlled Vocabulary Terms active antenna arrays; satellite antennas; satellite communication; technology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207