Anatomical post design meets quartz fiber technology: rationale and case report.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endodontically treated teeth frequently require a post and core to serve as a foundation for the coronal restoration. Remaining tooth structure, physical properties of the post material, post shape, and cement type all contribute to the success of the restoration. Post adaptation to the canal walls also represents an important element in the biomechanical performance of the prosthetic restoration. A double taper post system made of quartz fiber and epoxy was developed to conform more precisely to the shape of endodontically treated canals. Immediate benefits of this post system include minimal tooth structure removal during canal reshaping, greater post-to-canal adaptation in the apical and coronal half of the canal, and good post retention. The use of a quartz fiber/epoxy material with a lower modulus of elasticity also reduces the incidence of root fracture. Furthermore, the esthetic nature of the colors offered with this post system (translucent and off-white) provide a favorable foundation for eliminating discoloration caused by a metallic post placed under all-ceramic crown systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".