MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558896576 · doi:10.7238/a.v0i2.681

Avant-garde as Software

2002· article· en· W1558896576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArtnodes · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotographic and Visual Arts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtNova scotiaArt historySociologyEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'article analitza la singularitat de la revolució dels nous media i la compara amb la revolució avantguardista en el disseny, el cinema i les arts visuals que es va esdevenir als anys deu i vint. L'autor argumenta que les tècniques avantguardistes dels anys vint es van transformar en convencionalismes del programari i la interfície de l'ordinador i reivindica que, en realitat, els nous media representen una nova avantguarda per a la societat de la informació, encara que facin servir formes modernes antiquades. Si l'avantguarda dels anys vint va sorgir amb formes noves per als nous media de l'època (fotografia, cinema, la nova impremta i tecnologies arquitectòniques), la nova avantguarda dels media presenta maneres radicalment innovadores d'utilització dels media ja existents. Així, les tècniques informàtiques que permeten accedir als media, manipular-los i analitzar-los constitueixen la nova avantguarda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it