MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558899079

Bayesian source track prediction in an uncertain environmental inversion

2009· article· en· W1558899079 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Stan E. Dosso, Michael J. Wilmut

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSource trackingBayesian probabilityProbabilistic logicProbability density functionTrack (disk drive)Inversion (geology)Marginal distributionAcousticsTracking (education)Bayesian inferenceRange (aeronautics)Random variableComputer scienceGeologyGeodesyEnvironmental scienceStatisticsMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsSeismology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study was conducted to consider probabilistic prediction of the potential locations of a moving acoustic source in the ocean based on earlier locations determined by Bayesian source tracking in an uncertain environment. The Bayesian tracking approach considered both source and environmental parameters as unknown random variables constrained by posterior probability density (PPD) over the environmental parameters. The approach considered source and environmental parameters to obtain a time-ordered series of joint marginal probability surfaces over source range and depth. Acoustic data were measured at 300 Hz at a vertical array consisting of 24 sensors at 4-m spacing from 26- to 118-m depth. The track consisted of an acoustic source at 30-m depth moving toward the array at a constant radial velocity of 5 m/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207