Vitrines coloniales : ethnologie plastique de l'Algérie à l'Exposition universelle de 1889 à Paris
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the colonial era, the way in which the West tended to construct and objectify colonial entities was also manifested in the form oftwo-and three-dimensional physical reconstructions, such as the colonial pavilions at world fairs. Responding to the wide-ranging objectives of the major world fairs in the second half of the nineteenth century, these colonial pavilions were presented as symbols and representations of life in the colonies. By studying the Algerian pavilion at the 1889 Paris World Fat, the autlior states that these sites promoted a process of understanding and recontextualizing the cultures of colonized peoples that led to their appropriation and integration into the general metropolitan culture. This process took place both in terms of the building's integration into the fair, and in terms of the building itself, which stood as a distillation of the culture of a colonized people. Resume A l'epoque coloniale, « l'Orient cree par l'Occident » a aussi ete materialise dans des reconstitutions plastiques bidimensionnelles ou tridimensionnelles, en particulier les pavillons coloniaux d'expositions universelles. Repondant aux ambitions encyclopediques des grandes expositions universelles de la seconde moitie du XIXe siecle, ces pavillons coloniaux se presentaient comme des instantanes et des syntheses de la vie en colonies. En etudiant le cas du pavillon algerien a l'Exposition universelle de 1889 a Paris, l'auteur de l'article fait valoir que ces lieux favorisaient une operation d'apprehension et de recontextualisation des cultures des peuples colonises, qui menait a leur appropriation et leur integration dans l'ensemble culturel metropolitain. Ce processus s'exercait tant dans l'integration de l'edifice au cadre d'exposition que dans l'edifice lui-meme, s'offrant comme un concentre de la culture d'une population colonisee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".