Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie l’intérêt de l’autobiographie pour mettre en lumière la convergence conceptuelle du sujet, du lieu et du récit. L’auteur examine trois approches des rapports sujet-écrivain, lieu et écriture propres à la géographie littéraire, en montrant que ces trois éléments y sont rarement considérés sur un pied d’égalité conceptuelle. Il préconise une conception riche du sujet (qui ne nie pas les facteurs qui le traversent), active du lieu et médiatrice du récit. Le cas de Charles Bukowski (1920-1994), écrivain californien dont l’oeuvre est autobiographique à divers degrés, sert à illustrer les rapports mutuellement constitutifs de ces trois notions. L’autobiographie, littéraire ou non, permet de donner un contenu concret à cette convergence théorique et méthodologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it