MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1559071042 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178626

Monotone optimal policies in portfolio liquidation problems

2015· article· en· W1559071042 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel J. Crawford, Vikram Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonotone polygonPortfolioMathematical optimizationCountable setOptimal controlMarkov decision processHamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equationStochastic controlAsset (computer security)Portfolio optimizationMarkov processDiscrete time and continuous timeSimultaneous perturbation stochastic approximationComputer scienceStochastic processMathematicsEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work considers the problem of optimal liquidation of a single risky asset portfolio as a denumerable Markov Decision Processes (MDP) control problem. The model is defined over discrete time, state, and action sets, and the optimal liquidation strategy is the solution to Bellman's equation. It is shown that the optimal strategy is monotone in the number of shares owned, the time remaining to liquidation, and the price of the underlying asset. This structural result can be exploited to estimate the optimal policy via the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) algorithm. Therefore, the optimal policy can be estimated without knowledge of the parameters of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStochastic processes and financial applications→French-language works237,207→