MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1559574642 · doi:10.25959/23210969

Breccia-hosted chemical and mineralogical zonation patterns of the northeast zone, Mt. Polley Cu-Ag-Au alkalic porphyry deposit, British Columbia, Canada

2010· dissertation· en· W1559574642 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. E. Pass

Bibliographic record

VenueUTAS Research Repository · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrecciaGeologyGeochemistryMineralization (soil science)BasaltMagmatismVolcanic rockPaleontologyVolcanoTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mt. Polley alkalic Cu-Ag-Au porphyry was emplaced in the late Triassic to early Jurassic Quesnellia island-arc terrane of the Canadian Cordillera. In the Central Quesnel Belt, Middle Triassic fine-grained oceanic sediments ¬¨¬± limestone were overlain by a thick pile of Late Triassic submarine, alkalic basaltic to andesitic volcanics (Nicola Group), with related subvolcanic intrusions and minor limestones of Late Triassic age. The Mt. Polley Complex is a 6.0 km long by 3.5 km wide, north-northwest-trending, composite alkalic intrusive (and breccia) complex; one of several that are scattered along the length of this terrane, making British Columbia the type location for Au-enriched alkalic porphyry deposits. The Mt. Polley Complex contains silica-undersaturated to silica-saturated pyroxenites, diorites and syenites, but is dominated by monzonites, monzodiorites, and associated breccia bodies, all of which were emplaced during the final stages of arc magmatism, between 209.4 Ma and 195.4 Ma. Mineralization occurred between 209 and 204 Ma. A new model Pb age of 207.8 ¬¨¬± 1.8 Ma for a galena vein is consistent with these ages. The NEZ is an alkalic Cu-Ag-Au porphyry deposit hosted by the Mt. Polley Complex. Ore is distinctly higher grade than in other ore zones at Mt. Polley, with average Cu grades at 0.8‚Äö-1.0 percent and Au grades 0.19‚Äö-0.29 g/t. Mineralization and alteration mostly occurred during magmatic-hydrothermal breccia formation. Chalcopyrite and bornite occur primarily as coarse- to fine-grained breccia cement, with lesser disseminations, veins and replacements. Bornite-rich, pyrite-deficient high-grade zones of mineralization (>1% Cu, up to >5% Cu locally) occur within broader chalcopyrite-rich domains (Cu grades of 0.3 to 1.0 %). Pyrite is the dominant sulfide on the deposit periphery (up to 1‚Äö-2% locally). There were five major mineralization and alteration events in the NEZ: 1) early-stage (pre-breccia), 2) main-stage (syn-breccia), 3) post-brecciation late-stage mineralization, 4) barren intrusions, veins and vein breccia, and 5) epithermal-style veins. Main stage alteration and mineralization assemblages are zoned vertically and laterally through the breccia body. Magmatic-hydrothermal brecciation focused the high temperature mineralizing fluids, forming a core of potassic alteration (K-feldspar-magnetite-albite-calcite ¬¨¬± biotite ¬¨¬± augite ¬¨¬± anhydrite ¬¨¬± epidote and Cu-Fe-sulfides) surrounded by a halo of propylitic alteration (pyrite-chlorite-epidote ¬¨¬± albite ¬¨¬± sericite). Calc-potassic (garnet ¬¨¬± epidote) and sodic (albite) alteration assemblages are variably abundant within the broader domains of potassic and propylitic alteration. Alteration minerals are consistent with temperatures >300¬¨‚àûC and near-neutral to alkalic pH fluids during stages 1, 2 and 3. Acidic and lower temperature fluids were associated with stages 4 and 5. Laser-ablation ICP-MS analyses of sulfide trace element contents of the NEZ have shown bornite is enriched in Ag (average 913 ppm), Bi and Se. Chalcopyrite is enriched in Pb, Zn and Se, with Zn concentrations increasing and Pb concentrations decreasing from the centre of the deposit to its margins. Pyrite is enriched in Cu, Zn, Cd, Co, Ni, Se, Te and Au with these elements substituted into the pyrite structure or evenly disseminated as nano-particles. Pyrite contains abundant micro-inclusions of chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, electrum and tellurides. Gold contents were found to be 1‚Äö-3 orders of magnitude higher in pyrite (0.011‚Äö-4.32 ppm, plus one outlier of 483.2 ppm) than in chalcopyrite (0.050‚Äö-1.29 ppm). Gold was mostly below detection limits in bornite. Gold, Pd- and Pt-bearing inclusions were primarily detected in pyrite on the fringes of the deposit. This contradicts the assay data that shows high gold grades are associated with areas rich in bornite and chalcopyrite. This implies that the Au in the high-grade ore zones does not occur in Cu-sulfides, but in another phase, possibly electrum. The \\(˜í¬•^{34}S_{sulfide}\\) isotopic compositions of main- and late-stage chalcopyrite, pyrite and bornite range from -7.1 to +1.4 per mil, with most between -3 and -4 per mil. Sulfur isotopic compositions of anhydrite and gypsum were between +6.2 and +9.8 per mil, with two outliers of +13.6 and +14.0 per mil. These values, together with the presence of hematite, are consistent with an oxidized (sulfate predominant), high-temperature (>400¬¨‚àûC) magmatic-hydrothermal fluid. Limited sulfide geothermometry indicates that ore precipitated at temperatures from ~ 480¬¨‚àû to ~ 250¬¨‚àûC. The `˜í¬•^(34)S` values of main-stage sulfides define zonation patterns across the deposit, from low `˜í¬•^(34)S` values in the core to higher `˜í¬•^(34)S` values near the deposit periphery. Changes in redox conditions, pH changes, cooling, and water-rock interaction are concluded to have been important processes of ore formation and hydrothermal alteration in the NEZ. Hydrothermal calcite occurs throughout the paragenesis, and several processes may have contributed to its precipitation, including boiling, `CO_2` degassing, pH increase, and water-rock interaction. Calcite `˜í¬•^(13)C` values range from -0.2 to -10.5 per mil (average -3.0 ‚ÄövÑ‚àû), and `˜í¬•^(18)O` values from +4.0 to +20.9 per mil (average +15.4 ‚ÄövÑ‚àû). The C-O isotopic values are not consistent with simple precipitation from a normal‚ÄövÑvp magmatically-derived source hydrothermal fluid. Enriched `˜í¬•^(13)C` values suggest the involvement of a heavy carbon source, such as limestone or seawater. However, `˜í¬•^(18)O` isotopic data preclude the involvement of meteoric or seawater in the formation of the NEZ, until stage 4. Lead isotopic data suggest mixing of mantle and crustal sources during mineralization. Main-stage chalcopyrite, pyrite and late-stage galena have \\(^{206/204}Pb\\) values of 18.77‚Äö-18.92, \\(^{207/204}Pb\\) of 15.56‚Äö-15.59 and \\(^{208/204}Pb\\) of 38.22‚Äö-38.32. Strontium isotopic data (0.70331 to 0.70371) provide evidence of a strongly depleted mantle source of Sr with minor crustal input. Epsilon Nd values for main-stage apatite range between +5.9 and +6.5, also indicating a depleted mantle source. Stage 5 carbonate \\(^{206/204}Pb\\) values of 18.96‚Äö-19.04, \\(^{207/204}Pb\\) of 15.57‚Äö-15.59 and \\(^{208/204}Pb\\) of 38.26‚Äö-38.36, from epithermal-textured veins suggest that telescoping of an epithermal environment into the NEZ occurred ~100 m.y. after breccia formation. The stable and radiogenic isotopic data provide evidence that the silica-undersaturated alkalic Mt. Polley Complex formed due to carbonate assimilation prior to mineralization. This process can explain both the `˜í¬•^(13)C-˜í¬•^(18)O` isotopic data and the silica-undersaturated composition of the magmatic-hydrothermal system. The CO2 released during assimilation of carbonate could have promoted magmatic-hydrothermal brecciation, thereby leading to high-grade ore formation. Silica-undersaturated alkalic porphyry systems may preferentially form in arc terranes built on a carbonate-bearing substrate or where carbonate platforms are subducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUTAS Research RepositorySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207