MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1559590415 · doi:10.4000/sociologies.3435

La mesure comme représentation de l’objet

2021· article· fr· W1559590415 on OpenAlexaff
Jules Duchastel, Danielle Laberge

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologieS · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adoptant une perspective d’interpénétration des méthodes et nous centrant sur le rôle des actes méthodiques dans la production des connaissances, nous procédons à l’examen de la place et du rôle de l’interprétation dans le processus de la mesure. Partant de la définition d’Abraham Kaplan selon laquelle « la mesure est l’assignation de nombres à des objets, des événements ou des situations à partir d’un système de règles définissant des propriétés pouvant être quantifiées » (Kaplan, 1964), nous considérons la mesure comme une activité méthodique de recherche constituée d’un ensemble d’actes interprétatifs distincts, mis en œuvre à des moments divers du processus de recherche. Nous montrons que la mesure est susceptible à la fois de réduire la complexité et de la restaurer. La mesure ne peut être limitée à sa dimension quantitative. Elle se construit dans l’interrelation permanente avec les autres actes de connaissance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologieSSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207