Information Presentation of Professional Structure of Russian Society in Mass Media
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper analyzes the processes of mass media data content impact on social processes taking place within society. The key role of modern mass media in person’s life as a society’s information base is brought into focus. In this context the problem of circulating information quality and adequacy of information presentation of social processes of mass media is stated. The results of mass media activity influence many social processes, particularly the process of society’s professional structure formation. When commenting profession representatives and professional activity it forms certain image of society’s professional structure. Mass media influence on real occupational skill structure of society makes itself felt through the formation of social & professional hierarchy in person’s consciousness, the hierarchy closely related to the idea of status value of one or another profession, influencing on occupational choice. The results of the empiric study of information presentation of professional structure of the Russian society in mass media realized by means of content analysis of print media publications are represented. Regression model is built based on collected data to study interrelation between a number of factors such as actual professional structure of the Russian society, information presentation of professional structure created by mass media, need for specialists, average salary, status value of professions, and various professional groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it