Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les modèles traditionnels de leadership māori, bien qu’encore prégnants pour certains, ont perdu une grande partie de leur actualité au cours du processus de colonisation. Depuis, ceux et celles qui se sont affirmés au plan de la recherche, s’ils n’ont pas toujours eu accès aux réseaux traditionnels qui encadraient et encourageaient ce leadership, en ont néanmoins introduit de nouvelles formes. Le présent article explore cette notion de leadership dans la communauté du marae Awataha, sur la rive nord d’Auckland, communauté avec laquelle j’ai poursuivi mes recherches et discuté des transformations qui ont affecté le leadership māori au fil du temps. Ce leadership s’observe dans les domaines de l’expression des passions, de l’engagement, du service à la collectivité, de l’humilité, de la tolérance et du courage dans l’adversité. Toutes ces qualités sont autant d’aspects d’un leadership efficace favorisant des transformations positives pour le développement à venir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".