MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1559745654 · doi:10.1109/imtc.1997.604014

Modeling a micro-spectrometer for numerical correction of its metrological parameters

2002· article· en· W1559745654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrometerMetrologyImaging spectrometerDecompositionNonlinear systemSpectrogramComputer scienceMathematical modelOpticsPhysicsChemistryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical correction of spectrograms is based on the use of mathematical models of the relationship between a measured spectrum and the output of a spectrometer used for measurements. In this paper, a method for mathematical modeling of the microspectrometer is proposed and discussed. This method is based on decomposition of the spectrometer into functional blocks and on black-box modeling of those blocks. The input-output model of the spectrometer is obtained by combining the mathematical models of its functional blocks. An example of modeling of the micro-spectrometer SD1000 (by Ocean Optics) is given. The superiority of the obtained nonlinear model over a linear one is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical and Acousto-Optic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207