MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1559786496 · doi:10.5772/8017

RFID Modeling in Healthcare

2010· book-chapter· en· W1559786496 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Laskowski, Bryan Demianyk, G. Naigeboren, Blake W. Podaima, Marcia Friesen, R.D. McLeo

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsReal-time locating systemComputer scienceHealth careProvisioningRisk analysis (engineering)Data scienceSystems engineeringEngineeringReal-time computingBusinessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasingly, healthcare management systems include investment in and implementation of technology to track the status and movement of various entities within the healthcare environment, including patients, healthcare workers and physical assets. This is often a means of understanding patient flow, controlling inventory, tracking equipment usage, and thereby (ideally) assessing efficiencies in order to optimize resources and processes within that environment (Wang et al., 2006). The focus of this chapter is to highlight the contributions of RFID systems modeling, particularly in relation to an understanding of the nature and extent of system error that is often overlooked experientially. The healthcare environment was chosen as it is an increasingly complex and interesting application area for RFID, and in which a wide range of RFID-based applications and devices already exist and can be envisioned for the future. The insights gained through modeling provide a complementary set of data to those gained from the experiential knowledge of performance in existing installations. To that end, this chapter focuses on a case study of an agent-based model (ABM) of a hospital emergency department (ED), with extensions to modeling the provisioning of a real-time location system (RTLS) using RFID for patient tracking. To contextualize this work, Section 2 reviews conventional and emerging RFID applications in healthcare. Section 3 introduces the agent based modeling technique, invoked to investigate system performance in an application for RFID-enabled patient tracking within an ED. The ABM was developed as a decision support tool oriented towards optimizing RFID placement (minimizing uncertainty) for an actual ED where healthcare managers are considering the deployment of such systems. Section 4 outlines the ABM simulation results, with a particular focus on the nature and extent of system error and uncertainty – both spatial and temporal – that modeling illuminates. Section 5 discusses implementation strategies for an RFID RTLS system reflecting a Service Oriented Architecture approach that leverages existing software systems and focuses on being IP-centric and application- and device-agnostic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207