A Influência do Gesto na Performance em Percussão: Análise Fatorial de Correspondências sobre Dados Experimentais.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo apresenta os resultados conclusivos das analises dos dados recolhidos do experimento “Sensacao de continuidade de um trecho musical” (CHAIB et. al. 2012) atraves da tecnica estatistica Analise Fatorial de Correspondencias (AFC). O objetivo principal dessa analise foi o de observar e constatar, atraves dos indices estatisticos, a influencia do gesto na transmissao de sensacoes de continuidade , suspensao e conclusao captadas por um individuo sobre a performance em percussao. Os resultados aqui apresentados permitem ao interprete percussionista delinear uma pratica performativa onde a gestao dos gestos corporais tornam-se fundamentais para a construcao da sua performance. Atraves das observacoes dos resultados poderemos perceber como a relacao cognitiva, sensorial e perceptiva entre o performer e o espectador nao podem ser ignoradas, correndo-se o risco de comprometer a qualidade do resultado performativo final. Uma vez alcancado o objetivo principal , sera possivel generalizar os resultados em performances realizadas sobre os mesmos moldes das apresentadas no experimento. Palavras-chave : Gesto; Influencia; Performance; Percussao; AFC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".